tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17860701.post116787941715650408..comments2023-05-05T19:16:03.753+08:00Comments on re:ACT | reallyarchitecture: Underlying questions - Ronald's postReally Architecturehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16362400287282566491noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17860701.post-1167965164468575712007-01-05T10:46:00.000+08:002007-01-05T10:46:00.000+08:00Hi Ngai Keong,the example you mention that should ...Hi Ngai Keong,<BR/><BR/>the example you mention that should not be referred to as "participatory design" as it should be "participatory desion-making", I do believe that it could be a legitimate process and there's "no one to point the fingers at". And I felt that for once, the involvement process for the *Scape competition was very healthy. <BR/><BR/>Yet, I still have a lingering doubt. My Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17860701.post-1167927034686426862007-01-05T00:10:00.000+08:002007-01-05T00:10:00.000+08:00Hi Ronald and everyone, Ngai Keong here. i guess p...Hi Ronald and everyone, Ngai Keong here. i guess participatory design could refer to collecting public opinions, and allowing the public to choose the design they like. This "phenomenon" is ever-increasing in popularity, throwing the decision making by an individual or a panel of judges to the masses ala American Idol style, so that no one can be blamed for a "wrong" decision.<BR/><BR/>Even then,Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com